Co-infection with Influenza: Do Not Forget Aspergillus in the Immunosuppressed Neutropenic Host

Article information

Tuberc Respir Dis. 2014;76(5):249-249
Publication date (electronic) : 2014 May 29
doi : https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2014.76.5.249
1Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Address for correspondence: Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis, M.D., Sc.D. Division of Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT 12.5069, Unit 1463, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Phone: 1-713-792-6517, Fax: 1-713-792-5669, dkontoyi@mdanderson.org
Received 2014 February 24; Revised 2014 March 20; Accepted 2014 April 15.

To the editor: We read the comprehensive grand rounds review by Chertow and Memoli1 with great interest. The authors appropriately point out the frequent bacterial pulmonary co-infections following severe influenza. As immunosuppression is a well-known risk factor for complicating influenza2, we would like to point out the vulnerability of these patients not only to conventional bacterial super-infections (such as pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus, Pneumococcal pneumoniae, or gram negative rods), but also to opportunistic fungi, especially Aspergillus species. Although invasive pulmonary necrotizing aspergillosis has been described as a following influenza in apparently immunocompetent hosts3, single institution studies, encompassing the era before4 and during the H1N1 influenza pandemic5, mostly point out the occurrence of invasive aspergillosis in hospitalized patients with hematologic cancer. The frequency of this post-influenza complication is not well captured in the existing literature but its implications are twofold in immunocompromised patients. First, increased awareness needs to be made for prompt diagnostic work up and pre-emptive antifungal therapy targeting invasive molds in patients with complicated influenza course and suggestive radiologic findings (e.g., cavitary lesions, nodules, air-crescent sign). Second, although it has been limited in use by national health system6 and not been studied specifically, intensifying antifungal prophylaxis with the use of mold-active triazoles and increased surveillance by non-culture based diagnostic tests, such as Aspergillus galactomannan, might have an impact for post-influenza invasive aspergillosis, a disease with historically high mortality rates.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Chertow DS, Memoli MJ. Bacterial coinfection in influenza: a grand rounds review. JAMA 2013;309:275–282. 23321766.
2. Kunisaki KM, Janoff EN. Influenza in immunosuppressed populations: a review of infection frequency, morbidity, mortality, and vaccine responses. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:493–504. 19628174.
3. Fischer JJ, Walker DH. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis associated with influenza. JAMA 1979;241:1493–1494. 372590.
4. Yousuf HM, Englund J, Couch R, Rolston K, Luna M, Goodrich J, et al. Influenza among hospitalized adults with leukemia. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1095–1099. 9195063.
5. Vehreschild JJ, Brockelmann PJ, Bangard C, Verheyen J, Vehreschild MJ, Michels G, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus infection coinciding with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients. Epidemiol Infect 2012;140:1848–1852. 22152763.
6. Kwon JC, Kim SH, Park SH, Choi SM, Lee DG, Choi JH, et al. Prognosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic diseases in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis 2012;72:284–292.

Article information Continued