Tuberc Respir Dis > Volume 89(2); 2026 > Article
Koo and Bhatt: Imaging in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Ready for Prime Time?

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health burden, affecting over 392 million individuals and causing approximately 3.3 million deaths annually. Although spirometry remains the cornerstone for diagnosing airflow limitation, it incompletely reflects the structural and biological heterogeneity of the disease, and many smokers with preserved spirometry exhibit substantial parenchymal and airway abnormalities. Advances in imaging—particularly quantitative computed tomography (QCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)—enable comprehensive assessment of structural, functional, and inflammatory processes in COPD. QCT-derived emphysema metrics, including the 15th percentile lung density, mean lung density, and low attenuation area percentage, are reproducible, sensitive to progression, and widely used as outcome measures. Small airway disease can be characterized using parametric response mapping and complementary voxel-based indices that detect subclinical gas trapping and regional volume changes. The concept of mechanically affected lung highlights functionally impaired regions adjacent to emphysema that contribute to disease progression and mortality. Airway remodeling metrics, such as Pi10, PiSlope, tapering slope, and airway fractal dimension, further provide prognostic information. Mucus plug burden independently predicts mortality and represents a potential surrogate endpoint in therapeutic trials. Advanced MRI techniques and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET offer radiation-free or inflammatory insights, respectively. Current evidence supports that imaging is ready to evolve from an adjunct to a core element of COPD research and care.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting an estimated 392 million patients, with up to 95% remaining undiagnosed [1,2]. In 2019, COPD accounted for 3.3 million deaths globally, ranking as the eighth leading cause of years of life lost [3]. Traditionally, the diagnosis of COPD has relied on spirometric measurements. Although spirometry remains an essential tool for defining airflow limitation [4], there is increasing recognition that it does not fully capture the clinical, structural, and pathobiological heterogeneity of the disease. Many individuals with significant structural lung abnormalities may have normal spirometry, and conversely, patients with airflow obstruction may differ widely in symptom burden, prognosis, and underlying pathology.
The emergence of advanced imaging technologies, especially quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has enabled detailed structural and functional characterization of the lung. Imaging biomarkers provide spatially resolved, noninvasive assessment that allows refined disease phenotyping, risk stratification, and longitudinal monitoring. Importantly, these tools can detect subclinical disease even in smokers without spirometric impairment, thereby facilitating earlier identification and potentially timely intervention. Large multicenter cohort data likewise underscore the limitations of spirometry and support multidimensional imaging-based approaches [5-8].
The use of radiomics, machine learning, and opportunistic screening via low-dose computed tomography (CT) is further enhancing the predictive capabilities of imaging in at-risk populations. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in identifying airflow obstruction from chest imaging alone, pointing toward future integration into screening pathways [9,10].

QCT-Driven Biomarkers in COPD

Findings from the large, multicenter COPDGene study highlight the limitations of using spirometry alone for assessment of COPD. Among smokers without airflow obstruction (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] 0), 42.3% exhibited CT evidence of emphysema, airway wall thickening, or gas trapping. These results indicate that the burden of smoking-induced lung damage is substantially underestimated when relying solely on spirometry [5,6]. These findings have led to the development of a new multidimensional diagnostic schema for COPD, that includes spirometry, symptoms, and imaging. Furthermore, radiomics-based prediction models from COPDGene have outperformed those based on demographics or emphysema extent only, achieving diagnostic accuracy comparable to models integrating clinical and quantitative density-based imaging variables for COPD detection [8].

1. Emphysema and lung density metrics

QCT has enabled the development of diverse imaging biomarkers to characterize structural changes in COPD [11,12]. Emphysema burden is commonly quantified using the 15th percentile point of lung density (PD15) and the mean lung density, both of which are reproducible and sensitive to longitudinal change [13,14]. Changes in lung density-based metrics have been validated as endpoints in interventional trials, particularly in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency, where augmentation therapy with alpha1-proteinase inhibitor has been shown to attenuate emphysema progression [15-17]. In addition, low attenuation area (LAA%) [18], reflecting emphysema burden, is associated with symptoms, lung function decline, exacerbations, and mortality [19-22]. Although the CT quantification of emphysema is affected by different scanning conditions and reconstruction methods [23], a threshold of ≥5% is considered as clinically significant disease and identifying individuals at risk for COPD even without airflow obstruction [24,25]. The spatial distribution of emphysema also influences lung function [26,27]. Fractal geometry-derived exponent D, which quantify the size distribution of emphysematous regions, detects parenchymal destruction in early-stage COPD even when LAA% remains unchanged [20]. The combination of D with LAA% improves histologic severity estimation and predicts outcomes, with longitudinal decreases in D and increases in LAA% indicating disease progression [28].

2. Small airway disease: parametric response mapping

Small airway disease can be assessed by parametric response mapping (PRM), which classifies lung voxels into emphysema, functional small airway disease (fSAD), or normal tissue through voxel-wise registration of inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. fSAD is defined as lung regions that appear normal on inspiratory CT (attenuation value >-950 Hounsfield unit [HU]) but fail to show the expected increase in attenuation on expiratory CT (<-856 HU) (Figure 1), reflecting gas trapping due to small airway dysfunction [10]. In patients with airflow obstruction (GOLD 1-4 COPD) in the COPDGene study, both PRM fSAD and PRM emphysema predicted subsequent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) decline, whereas in GOLD 0, only PRM fSAD was predictive [29]. In the COPDGene cohort, the ratio of the mean lung density at end expiration (E) to that at end inspiration (I) was calculated in normal density (ND) lung regions [30]. Smokers exhibited higher ND-E/I ratios than nonsmokers, and 26.3% of smokers without airflow obstruction exceeded the 90th percentile value noted in nonsmokers. Elevated ND-E/I was associated with worse lung function, poorer health status, reduced functional capacity, and faster FEV₁ decline, indicating that subthreshold gas trapping, reflecting mild small airway disease is common and clinically relevant in this population.

3. Jacobian determinant and mechanically affected lung

Jacobian determinant mapping extends this voxel-based approach by quantifying regional lung volume change between inspiration and expiration, values greater than 1 indicate regional expansion, whereas values less than 1 indicate contraction, serving a crude estimate of lung elasticity. Mechanically affected lung (MAL) refers to morphologically normal-appearing regions that are mechanically influenced by adjacent emphysematous clusters. MAL is defined as normal voxels located within a specified distance from emphysematous areas (Figures 2, 3). Higher MAL values, particularly MAL₂ (within 2 mm), are associated with accelerated FEV₁ decline, indicating that morphologically normal-lung tissue can be mechanically compromised by adjacent emphysema [31]. Three-dimensional modeling using Gaussian smoothing further demonstrates that most new emphysema develops in areas of high (60.5%) or intermediate MAL (37.1%), with only small fraction arising from fSAD regions (4.8%) or zero MAL regions (2.4%) [32]. These findings suggest that mechanical stress exerted on surrounding lung tissue by existing emphysema is a dominant driver of disease progression. Consistently, higher MAL has also been linked to increased all-cause mortality [31,32].

4. Airway remodeling metrics

Airway remodeling is another important hallmark of COPD pathology that can be quantified using several CT-derived metrics. Pi10 represents the square root of the wall area for a standardized airway with a 10 mm internal perimeter [33,34]. In cigarette smokers, airway wall thickening reflected by higher Pi10 is thought to result from inflammatory changes and airway remodeling, and is associated with reduced lung function, diminished functional capacity, and worse quality of life across all GOLD stages [34]. Pi10 may be modifiable. Longitudinal studies have shown that Pi10 decreases after smoking cessation and increases with resumed smoking, suggesting that Pi10 is a potentially reversible marker of airway inflammation. Additionally, in individuals with severe asthma, treatment with dupilumab has been shown to reduce the wall area percentage, even in a small study population [35]. PiSlope is a novel metric that quantifies the slope of the luminal perimeter versus wall thickness across the entire airway size spectrum, overcoming the size-specific limitation of Pi10 [36]. PiSlope summarizes airway wall remodeling across a range of airway sizes by describing how wall thickness changes relative to airway perimeter. PiSlope is calculated as the slope of the luminal perimeter-wall thickness relationship using linear regression, normalized by the participants’ height squared (Figure 4). Lower PiSlope values indicate greater airway remodeling and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. PiSlope is moderately correlated with Pi10 (r=-0.57) but decreases with COPD severity and is independently associated with dyspnea, functional limitation, exacerbations, FEV₁ decline, and mortality, even after adjusting for Pi10.
Several measures of airway luminal remodeling are also been described. In COPDGene participants, airway surface area-to-volume ratio (SA/V) distinguished airway narrowing from airway loss [37]. Higher SA/V correlated with better function and quality of life, while lower SA/V predicted faster lung function decline and worse survival over 5 years in patients with predominant airway loss. These findings support SA/V as a clinically relevant imaging biomarker for COPD phenotyping and prognosis. Additional airway metrics such as the airway lumen tapering slope (T-Slope) and airway fractal dimension (AFD) provide complementary prognostic insights. T-Slope is the airway lumen tapering index, measured as slope of cumulative lumen area over airway generations (Figure 5) [38]. Lower T-Slope values reflect lumen tapering and greater remodeling, and are linked to worse lung function, lower functional capacity, worse quality of life, faster FEV₁ decline, higher exacerbation frequency, and higher mortality. AFD indicates loss of airway branching complexity (Figure 6), and is also associated with impairments in lung function, respiratory symptoms, functional capacity, exacerbation, lung function decline, and mortality [39]. When combined with higher peri-bronchial emphysema, lower AFD identifies individuals at substantially higher risk of death, offering prognostic value beyond conventional airway metrics and spirometry. Expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) is characterized by excessive airway collapse during expiration either from cartilaginous weakening or redundancy of the posterior membranous wall, which includes tracheobronchomalacia and excessive dynamic airway collapse (Figure 7) [40]. ECAC is defined as ≥50% reduction in central airway luminal area during expiration, occurs in approximately 5% of COPDGene participants and is independently associated with worse respiratory symptoms, increased exacerbations, and higher hospitalization rates, even in individuals without spirometric obstruction. Lastly, mucus plugs on CT are defined as the complete occlusion of medium- to large-sized airways [41]. In a retrospective COPDGene analysis with a median follow-up of 9.5 years, mucus plug burden, categorized as 0, 1-2, or ≥3 lung segments, was identified as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in COPD. Moreover, clearance of mucus plugs has been used as a surrogate outcome for assessing treatment response to biologics. Notably, dupilumab [35] and tezepelumab [42] have demonstrated efficacy in patients with severe asthma for the reduction of mucus plugs, and tozorakimab [43] in patients with COPD.

Functional and Inflammatory Imaging

Although CT-derived biomarkers provide valuable insights into COPD pathophysiology, several technical and biological sources of variability must be addressed for their widespread adoption [44]. Technical noise including differences in scanner calibration, acquisition protocols, radiation dose, slice thickness, reconstruction algorithms, and image analysis software, can affect measurement accuracy and reproducibility. Biological noise, such as differences in inspiratory level, cardiac or diaphragmatic motion, and comorbidities such as pneumonia or congestive heart failure, can also introduce noise. These challenges can be mitigated through protocol standardization, the use of multi-detector scanners, low-dose volumetric acquisitions, and soft-kernel reconstruction.
MRI offers a radiation-free alternative for structural and functional lung imaging, making it particularly suitable for longitudinal follow-up and pre-post intervention assessment. Advanced MRI techniques, including Ultrashort echo time and zero echo time, allow high-resolution structural imaging [45]. Hyperpolarized gas MRI (3He or 129Xe) enables quantification of ventilation heterogeneity, regional perfusion deficits, and early changes in apparent diffusion coefficient, a measure of emphysema, before spirometric abnormalities develop [46]. However, MRI still lags behind the resolution of CT scanning and requires further protocol standardization, technical refinement, and regulatory validation before widespread clinical implementation. Additionally, translating these advanced techniques into routine practice requires cost-effectiveness analyses and multicenter reproducibility data. Inflammatory imaging with 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) provides another dimension by quantifying pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation. Increased 18FDG uptake correlates strongly with FEV₁%, FEV₁/FVC, and PD15, supporting its potential role as a mechanistic biomarker and as a tool for evaluating therapeutic interventions targeting lung inflammation [47].

Translational and Implementation Considerations

Imaging-derived biomarkers in COPD are increasingly serving as decision-support and risk-stratification tools that complement spirometry and established clinical algorithms. While their integration into routine clinical practice continues to evolve, ongoing efforts in standardization, automation, and external validation are steadily strengthening their clinical applicability. Although many advanced imaging biomarkers were initially developed and validated in large Western cohorts such as COPDGene, expanding validation across diverse populations, including regions with distinct environmental exposures, smoking patterns, biomass fuel exposure, and disease phenotypes, will further enhance their global relevance.
The robustness of QCT-derived biomarkers is influenced by technical factors such as scanner vendors, radiation dose, reconstruction kernel, slice thickness, inspiratory effort, and post-processing algorithms. These sources of variability can affect density-based measures, texture analysis, and fractal geometry-derived metrics, underscoring the importance of harmonization and quality control for cross-center comparability and longitudinal consistency.
To address these challenges, several mitigation strategies have been proposed. Standardized acquisition protocols, structured patient coaching for inspiratory-expiratory consistency, real-time lung volume monitoring, predefined quality-control thresholds for paired scans, and multicenter calibration initiatives are increasingly incorporated into research and clinical workflows. Beyond conventional protocol standardization, statistical harmonization techniques and emerging deep learning (DL)-based normalization approaches, including generative adversarial network-based image harmonization, are being actively investigated to improve cross-scanner reproducibility.
In parallel, many quantitative imaging biomarkers currently rely on complex post-processing pipelines that require specialized software, substantial computational resources, and technical expertise. However, end-toend DL models are emerging as scalable alternatives that learn predictive patterns from minimally processed CT data. These approaches offer potential advantages in automation, computational efficiency, and robustness to acquisition variability, while capturing complex multiscale spatial relationships beyond handcrafted metrics. Continued advances in interpretability, external validation, regulatory alignment, and workflow integration will further facilitate their broader clinical implementation.

Conclusion

Imaging is fundamentally reshaping the conceptual and clinical framework of COPD. QCT, advanced MRI, and PET imaging-based approaches enable detailed, patient-specific characterization of structural, functional, and inflammatory changes, supporting earlier detection, refined phenotyping, and improved prognostication. The integration of multiple imaging modalities and analytic techniques further enhances our understanding of disease heterogeneity and progression.
Imaging biomarkers in COPD have moved beyond exploratory research tools and are entering an era of validated, increasingly actionable clinical integration. As technological capabilities, analytical methods, and standardization frameworks continue to advance, imaging is poised to assume an expanding role in precision respiratory medicine, approaching its prime time within defined clinical contexts.

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: all authors. Methodology: all authors. Investigation: all authors. Writing - original draft preparation: all authors. Writing - review and editing: all authors. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT: No. RS-2024-00359875). The funding bodies played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript.

Fig. 1.
Representative inspiratory/expiratory computed tomography (CT) and parametric response mapping (PRM) of functional small airway disease (PRMfSAD) and emphysema (PRMEmph) across Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages 1-4. Progressive increase in PRMfSAD and PRMEmph burden with advancing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Reproduced from Bhatt et al., with permission from American Thoracic Society [29].
trd-2025-0202f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
(A-E) Workflow for mechanically affected lung analysis. Reproduced from Bhatt et al., with permission from American Thoracic Society [31]. CT: computed tomography; HU: Hounsfield unit; 3D: three-dimension.
trd-2025-0202f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Representative computed tomography (CT) visualization of mechanically affected lung (MAL) adjacent to emphysematous regions. Inspiratory CT image (left), emphysematous regions identified as voxels <-950 HU (middle), and MAL visualized as morphologically normal voxels located within a defined distance from emphysematous areas. Reproduced from Bhatt et al., with permission from American Thoracic Society [32].
trd-2025-0202f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Quantification of airway wall remodeling using the PiSlope metric. (A) Airway segmentation and cross-sectional analysis derived from computed tomography. (B) Scatterplot of the square root of the wall area against the internal perimeter of the corresponding airway sections. The regression line (red) represents the PiSlope. PiSlope is calculated as the slope of the luminal perimeter-wall thickness relationship across the entire airway size spectrum, normalized by participant height squared, thereby providing a size-independent index of airway remodeling. Reproduced from Bhatt et al., with permission from Radiological Society of North America [36].
trd-2025-0202f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Quantification of airway lumen tapering using the T-Slope metric across chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity stages. Airway tapering analysis using computed tomography (CT). (A) Airway tree reconstruction and centerline extraction, with distance mapping from the tracheal inlet. (B) Estimation of cumulative cross-sectional airway lumen area (CSA) as a function of geodesic distance from the trachea; the slope of this relationship represents the TSlope. (C) Box plots showing T-Slope values across Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) COPD stages, demonstrating progressive reduction of T-Slope with disease severity. Reproduced from Bodduluri et al., with permission from European Respiratory Society [38]. Reused under the authors’ self-reuse rights for scholarly, non-commercial purposes. *p<0.001. NS: not significant.
trd-2025-0202f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
Airway fractal dimension (AFD) reflecting loss of airway branching complexity. Representative airway models illustrating the effect of airway loss and narrowing on AFD. (A) Progressive loss of airway is associated with stepwise reductions in AFD, despite substantial reductions in airway volume. (B) Progressive narrowing of airway similarly reduces AFD, even when airway structures remain present. These findings demonstrate that AFD captures loss of airway branching complexity independent of airway volume, supporting its use an imaging biomarker of airway remodeling. Reproduced from Bodduluri et al. [39], open access article under CC-BY license.
trd-2025-0202f6.jpg
Fig. 7.
Expiratory central airway collapse on computed tomography (CT). (A) Inspiratory CT showing a normal appearing central airway. (B) Expiratory CT demonstrating excessive airway collapse due to posterior membranous wall redundancy. Reproduced from Bhatt et al., with permission from American Medical Association [40].
trd-2025-0202f7.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Adeloye D, Song P, Zhu Y, Campbell H, Sheikh A, Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2022;10:447-58.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Siddharthan T, Pollard SL, Quaderi SA, Rykiel NA, Wosu AC, Alupo P, et al. Discriminative accuracy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening instruments in 3 low- and middle-income country settings. JAMA 2022;327:151-60.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Stolz D, Mkorombindo T, Schumann DM, Agusti A, Ash SY, Bafadhel M, et al. Towards the elimination of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Lancet Commission. Lancet 2022;400:921-72.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Sobhanan A, Shrinath V, Deshpande S, Tyagi R, Marwah V. Beyond smoking: exploring etiotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2023 classification. Cureus 2025;17:e94579.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Regan EA, Lynch DA, Curran-Everett D, Curtis JL, Austin JH, Grenier PA, et al. Clinical and radiologic disease in smokers with normal spirometry. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1539-49.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Kirby M, Tanabe N, Tan WC, Zhou G, Obeidat M, Hague CJ, et al. Total airway count on computed tomography and the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease progression: findings from a population-based study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197:56-65.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Bhatt SP, Abadi E, Anzueto A, Bodduluri S, Casaburi R, Castaldi PJ, et al. A multidimensional diagnostic approach for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 2025;333:2164-75.
pmid pmc
8. Amudala Puchakayala PR, Sthanam VL, Nakhmani A, Chaudhary MFA, Kizhakke Puliyakote A, Reinhardt JM, et al. Radiomics for improved detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in low-dose and standard-dose chest CT scans. Radiology 2023;307:e222998.
pmid pmc
9. Chaudhary MF, Hoffman EA, Guo J, Comellas AP, Newell JD, Nagpal P, et al. Predicting severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations using quantitative CT: a retrospective model development and external validation study. Lancet Digit Health 2023;5:e83-92.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Galban CJ, Han MK, Boes JL, Chughtai KA, Meyer CR, Johnson TD, et al. Computed tomography-based biomarker provides unique signature for diagnosis of COPD phenotypes and disease progression. Nat Med 2012;18:1711-5.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Han MK, Kazerooni EA, Lynch DA, Liu LX, Murray S, Curtis JL, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations in the COPDGene study: associated radiologic phenotypes. Radiology 2011;261:274-82.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Mohamed Hoesein FA, de Hoop B, Zanen P, Gietema H, Kruitwagen CL, van Ginneken B, et al. CT-quantified emphysema in male heavy smokers: association with lung function decline. Thorax 2011;66:782-7.
crossref pmid
13. Saha P, Bodduluri S, Nakhmani A, Chaudhary MF, Amudala Puchakayala PR, Sthanam V, et al. Computed tomography radiomics features predict change in lung density and rate of emphysema progression. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2025;22:83-92.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Washko GR, Kinney GL, Ross JC, San Jose Estepar R, Han MK, Dransfield MT, et al. Lung mass in smokers. Acad Radiol 2017;24:386-92.
crossref pmid
15. Dirksen A, Piitulainen E, Parr DG, Deng C, Wencker M, Shaker SB, et al. Exploring the role of CT densitometry: a randomised study of augmentation therapy in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J 2009;33:1345-53.
crossref pmid
16. Chapman KR, Burdon JG, Piitulainen E, Sandhaus RA, Seersholm N, Stocks JM, et al. Intravenous augmentation treatment and lung density in severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency (RAPID): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:360-8.
crossref pmid
17. Sorrells S, Camprubi S, Griffin R, Chen J, Ayguasanosa J. SPARTA clinical trial design: exploring the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor augmentation therapy in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Respir Med 2015;109:490-9.
crossref pmid
18. Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, de Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Jacobovitz D, Cosio MG, et al. Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:187-92.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Grydeland TB, Dirksen A, Coxson HO, Eagan TM, Thorsen E, Pillai SG, et al. Quantitative computed tomography measures of emphysema and airway wall thickness are related to respiratory symptoms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:353-9.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Mishima M, Hirai T, Itoh H, Nakano Y, Sakai H, Muro S, et al. Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8829-34.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Nakano Y, Muro S, Sakai H, Hirai T, Chin K, Tsukino M, et al. Computed tomographic measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema in smokers: correlation with lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1102-8.
pmid
22. Shimizu K, Tanabe N, Tho NV, Suzuki M, Makita H, Sato S, et al. Per cent low attenuation volume and fractal dimension of low attenuation clusters on CT predict different long-term outcomes in COPD. Thorax 2020;75:116-22.
crossref pmid
23. Gierada DS, Bierhals AJ, Choong CK, Bartel ST, Ritter JH, Das NA, et al. Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index. Acad Radiol 2010;17:146-56.
pmid pmc
24. Han MK, Tayob N, Murray S, Woodruff PG, Curtis JL, Kim V, et al. Association between emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes in the COPDGene and SPIROMICS cohorts: a post hoc analysis of two clinical trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:265-7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
25. Han MK, Agusti A, Celli BR, Criner GJ, Halpin DMG, Roche N, et al. From GOLD 0 to pre-COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203:414-23.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Nakano Y, Sakai H, Muro S, Hirai T, Oku Y, Nishimura K, et al. Comparison of low attenuation areas on computed tomographic scans between inner and outer segments of the lung in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence and contribution to lung function. Thorax 1999;54:384-9.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Tanabe N, Muro S, Tanaka S, Sato S, Oguma T, Kiyokawa H, et al. Emphysema distribution and annual changes in pulmonary function in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2012;13:31.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
28. Gietema HA, Muller NL, Fauerbach PV, Sharma S, Edwards LD, Camp PG, et al. Quantifying the extent of emphysema: factors associated with radiologists’ estimations and quantitative indices of emphysema severity using the ECLIPSE cohort. Acad Radiol 2011;18:661-71.
pmid
29. Bhatt SP, Soler X, Wang X, Murray S, Anzueto AR, Beaty TH, et al. Association between functional small airway disease and FEV1 decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:178-84.
pmid pmc
30. Bodduluri S, Reinhardt JM, Hoffman EA, Newell JD, Nath H, Dransfield MT, et al. Signs of gas trapping in normal lung density regions in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:1404-10.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Bhatt SP, Bodduluri S, Hoffman EA, Newell JD, Sieren JC, Dransfield MT, et al. Computed tomography measure of lung at risk and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:569-76.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
32. Bhatt SP, Bodduluri S, Reinhardt JM, Nakhmani A. Mechanically affected lung and progression of emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:1409-17.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
33. Mohamed Hoesein FA, de Jong PA, Lammers JW, Mali WP, Schmidt M, de Koning HJ, et al. Airway wall thickness associated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second decline and development of airflow limitation. Eur Respir J 2015;45:644-51.
crossref pmid
34. Charbonnier JP, Pompe E, Moore C, Humphries S, van Ginneken B, Make B, et al. Airway wall thickening on CT: relation to smoking status and severity of COPD. Respir Med 2019;146:36-41.
crossref pmid
35. Svenningsen S, Kjarsgaard M, Haider E, Venegas C, Konyer N, Friedlander Y, et al. Effects of dupilumab on mucus plugging and ventilation defects in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;208:995-7.
crossref pmid pdf
36. Bhatt SP, Nakhmani A, Sthanam V, Kizhakke Puliyakote A, Reinhardt JM, Bodduluri S. PiSlope: a new CT metric for quantifying airway remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Radiology 2024;313:e240717.
crossref pmid pmc
37. Bodduluri S, Kizhakke Puliyakote A, Nakhmani A, Charbonnier JP, Reinhardt JM, Bhatt SP. Computed tomography-based airway surface area-to-volume ratio for phenotyping airway remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203:185-91.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
38. Bodduluri S, Nakhmani A, Kizhakke Puliyakote AS, Reinhardt JM, Dransfield MT, Bhatt SP. Airway tapering in COPD. Eur Respir J 2024;64:2400191.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Bodduluri S, Puliyakote ASK, Gerard SE, Reinhardt JM, Hoffman EA, Newell JD, et al. Airway fractal dimension predicts respiratory morbidity and mortality in COPD. J Clin Invest 2018;128:5374-82.
crossref pmid pmc
40. Bhatt SP, Terry NL, Nath H, Zach JA, Tschirren J, Bolding MS, et al. Association between expiratory central airway collapse and respiratory outcomes among smokers. JAMA 2016;315:498-505.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Diaz AA, Orejas JL, Grumley S, Nath HP, Wang W, Dolliver WR, et al. Airway-occluding mucus plugs and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 2023;329:1832-9.
crossref pmid pmc
42. Nordenmark LH, Hellqvist A, Emson C, Diver S, Porsbjerg C, Griffiths JM, et al. Tezepelumab and mucus plugs in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. NEJM Evid 2023;2:EVIDoa2300135.
crossref pmid
43. Singh D, Guller P, Reid F, Doffman S, Seppala U, Psallidas I, et al. A phase 2a trial of the IL-33 monoclonal antibody tozorakimab in patients with COPD: FRONTIER-4. Eur Respir J 2025;66:2402231.
crossref pmid pmc
44. Dirksen A. Monitoring the progress of emphysema by repeat computed tomography scans with focus on noise reduction. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:925-8.
crossref pmid pdf
45. Elbehairy AF, Marshall H, Naish JH, Wild JM, Parraga G, Horsley A, et al. Advances in COPD imaging using CT and MRI: linkage with lung physiology and clinical outcomes. Eur Respir J 2024;63:2301010.
crossref pmid
46. Stewart NJ, Smith LJ, Chan HF, Eaden JA, Rajaram S, Swift AJ, et al. Lung MRI with hyperpolarised gases: current & future clinical perspectives. Br J Radiol 2022;95:20210207.
crossref pmid pdf
47. Subramanian DR, Jenkins L, Edgar R, Quraishi N, Stockley RA, Parr DG. Assessment of pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation in emphysema by quantitative positron emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:1125-32.
crossref pmid pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
101-605, 58, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu (Seocho-dong, Seocho Art-Xi), Seoul 06652, Korea
Tel: +82-2-575-3825, +82-2-576-5347    Fax: +82-2-572-6683    E-mail: katrdsubmit@lungkorea.org                

Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next