Tuberc Respir Dis > Accepted Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0154    [Accepted]
Published online March 6, 2025.
Predictors of suboptimal peak inspiratory flow in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in real clinical practice
Natalia V. Trushenko1,2  , Baina B. Lavginova1  , Svetlana Yu. Chikina1  , Natalia E. Obukhova3  , Iuliia A. Levina1  , Fedor D. Tkachenko1  , Galina V. Nekludova1,2  , Zamira M. Merzhoeva1  , Sergey N. Avdeev1,2 
1Pulmonology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Healthcare Ministry of Russia, 5, Dovator St.15, Bldg. 2, 119048, Moscow, Russia
2Pulmonology Scientific Research Institute, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russian Federation, Orekhovyy Boulevard 28, 115682 Moscow, Russia
3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central State Medical Academy, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence:  Natalia V. Trushenko,
Email: trushenko.natalia@yandex.ru
Received: 1 November 2024   • Revised: 17 February 2025   • Accepted: 4 March 2025
Abstract
Background
Incorrect inhalation technique is one of the most common reasons for the ineffectiveness of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) therapy, increasing the frequency of exacerbations. Selection of treatment based on Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) measurements or predictors of suboptimal PIF (sPIF) could optimize therapy in patients with COPD. The goal of this study was to investigate a prevalence and predictors of sPIF in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD in clinical practice.
Methods
The study involved 72 patients hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbation. The analysis included demographic, clinical and lung function parameters. PIF was measured at the resistance level of patients’ inhalation device using In-Check DIAL G16 before and after explaining the inhalation technique, as well as at medium-low resistance (R2) and high resistance (R5) at admission and on discharge.
Results
Upon admission and before explaining the inhalation technique, sPIF was observed in 52.7% of patients, while after the explanation, the proportion of patients with sPIF decreased to 19.4% (p < 0.0001). ROC analysis revealed that independent predictors of suboptimal PIF were age >70 years; FVC <73% pred.; FEV1< 35% pred.; RV > 194% pred.; RV/TLC > 70%; DLco < 36% pred. The most significant predictors of sPIF were age (OR 0.89) and FEV1 (OR 0.59).
Conclusion
When choosing dry powder inhaler for the maintenance therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, it is important to consider the patient's ability to generate the optimal PIF taking into account the patient's age and the severity of functional impairments.
Key Words: COPD, exacerbation, peak inspiratory flow, dry powder inhaler, inhalation technique


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
101-605, 58, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu (Seocho-dong, Seocho Art-Xi), Seoul 06652, Korea
Tel: +82-2-575-3825, +82-2-576-5347    Fax: +82-2-572-6683    E-mail: katrdsubmit@lungkorea.org                

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next